Q

2.0

🏥State Medicaid & Healthcare Agencies

Modernize Medicaid operations without ripping out MMIS.

Member 360°. Eligibility automation. Program integrity. T-MSIS & CMS-64 reporting — all on a governed AI data foundation.

xAQUA augments your eligibility workers, program integrity team, and policy staff — it does not replace your MMIS, E&E modules, or MES vendors. It sits above them, federates queries across the stack, and turns plain-English intent into governed, auditable answers. Built for state Medicaid agencies with hard CMS, HIPAA, and MITA posture.

70%
Faster eligibility determinations
3 wks
From kickoff to first use case
0
Bytes of PHI leaving your env.
xAQUA · Cezu — Unwinding Recovery
👤
Show me enrollees due for renewal in the next 30 days who lost contact info during unwinding — flag any who may qualify for 12-month continuous eligibility.
🏥
12,847 enrollees match.
3,421 were procedurally disenrolled during unwinding.
847 children meet 12-month continuous eligibility window Eligible
Cross-reference with updated USPS NCOA address data?
👤
Yes — and flag any in MCO encounter data showing recent claims activity.
Same foundation. Production-validated. The xAQUA UDP runs at a $300B+ public pension fund in fully private deployment. Medicaid is the same engine — packaged for MMIS module integration, T-MSIS automation, and CMS-aligned compliance posture.
The Challenge

MMIS works. Getting answers across modules does not.

State Medicaid agencies cover 1 in 5 Americans across the largest, most fragmented public-program data estate in government. Modernizing the data layer without modernizing every system is the only path that fits the budget.

🗄️

Multi-Vendor MES Sprawl

MMIS for claims, separate E&E for eligibility, encounter data from MCOs, provider registries — each a different vendor and data model. Cross-system questions take days or never get answered.

5–10 vendor systems per state
📋

Eligibility & Unwinding Burden

Post-unwinding caseloads stress eligibility workers. Manual verification, renewal processing, and ex parte attempts strain agency staff. Procedural disenrollment risk stays high.

Worker caseloads at all-time highs
💰

FMAP & Reporting Pressure

Enhanced FMAP expired. State general fund spending up sharply. T-MSIS, CMS-64, and program-integrity reporting pull staff away from the work that matters.

Doing more with less
How It Works

One AI data foundation. Sits on top of what you already run.

xAQUA does not replace your systems of record. It does not bulk-copy your data. It federates queries with full authority enforcement — and every request is logged, scoped, and replayable.

DATA SOURCES xAQUA UDP — AI DATA FOUNDATION CONSUMERS MMIS ClaimsEncounter · AdjudicationEligibility & EnrollmentMAGI · Non-MAGI · RenewalsManaged Care EncountersMCO · Capitation · QualityProvider ManagementEnrollment · CredentialsPharmacy & RebatesNDC · 340B · MDRPDocuments & NoticesEligibility · Appeals · POA 🐕 Cezu — Plain-English Concierge Routes intent · Checks authority · Hands off to agents SIX AI DATA AGENTS StewardMember 360° GovernanceCompliance EngineerPipelines AnalystCross-Q&A ScientistRisk · Patterns BIReports Vertical Semantic Layer Member · Enrollment · Claim · Provider · Service · Diagnosis · Authorization Governance · HIPAA · MITA · CMS Reporting PHI handling · 42 CFR enforcement · Full audit trail · T-MSIS lineage Connectors — sits on your stack MMIS · E&E · MCO Data · Snowflake · Postgres · GovCloud Eligibility WorkersMember 360° in secondsClaims & BillingAdjudication insightProgram IntegrityFWA detectionQuality & PerformanceHEDIS · OutcomesPolicy & ReportingT-MSIS · CMS-64IG & AuditorsReplayable lineage xAQUA stores no PHI. Sits on top of the MES modules you already own. Data never leaves your boundary.
1
Connect, don't consolidateFederate queries across MMIS, E&E modules, MCO encounters, and provider systems. No bulk data movement, no parallel data warehouse to defend.
2
Plain English in, governed answers outCezu routes intent. Six specialized agents share one Medicaid semantic layer — Member, Enrollment, Claim, Provider, Service, Authorization.
3
HIPAA-aware by defaultPHI handling, 42 CFR Part 2 enforcement, MITA-aligned, T-MSIS lineage. Defensible to CMS, OIG, and state legislative oversight.
Scope of Coverage

Across the full program landscape.

From front-line operations to federal reporting. xAQUA covers the operational, analytical, and oversight workload across the agency.

🪪
Eligibility & Enrollment
MAGI · Non-MAGI · Renewals
💳
Claims Processing
MMIS adjudication
🏥
Managed Care
MCO encounters & quality
💊
Pharmacy & Rebates
NDC · 340B · MDRP
👨‍⚕️
Provider Network
Enrollment & directory
🛡️
Program Integrity
FWA · SUR · prepay edits
👴
LTSS & HCBS
Waiver · institutional
👶
Continuous Eligibility
12-month child compliance
🔄
Unwinding Recovery
Procedural disenroll
📊
T-MSIS Reporting
Federal data submission
📋
CMS-64 & FMAP
Quarterly reporting
⚕️
Quality & HEDIS
Performance measures
The Solution

Your AI Data Team — six agents, one platform.

Each agent is a specialist. Together they augment your front-line staff, analysts, and oversight team — without replacing the systems they already use.

📚
Member 360° Intelligence
AI Data Steward · SemantIQ · Entity 360

A unified, governed view of every Medicaid member across eligibility, claims, encounters, and provider interactions — assembled at query time, scoped to the requestor's authority.

Identity resolution across name changes, IDs, and household shifts
Dual-eligible (Medicare/Medicaid) tracking across data sources
Plain-English lookup for eligibility workers and case managers
🛡️
HIPAA & Program Integrity Governance
AI Data Governance · Qualix · SenseMask

PHI handling, 42 CFR Part 2 enforcement, RBAC, and full action audit. The compliance posture CMS audits and state IGs already require — not an afterthought.

PHI tagging and access enforcement at query time
Full audit trail — who asked what, with which authority
42 CFR Part 2 (SUD) handling for sensitive records
Eligibility & Renewal Automation
AI Data Analyst · Infera · ClickML

Automate ex parte renewals. Predict procedural disenrollment risk. Identify cross-program eligibility. Move workers from data entry to decision-making.

Ex parte renewal automation with audit trail
Procedural disenrollment risk scoring
12-month continuous eligibility compliance for children
🛠️
Claims & Encounter Engineering
AI Data Engineer · Composer

Reconcile MMIS claims with MCO encounters. Detect data-quality issues before they break T-MSIS submission. Catch capitation and rate anomalies before payment cycles close.

Claims/encounter reconciliation across MMIS and MCO data
T-MSIS data quality monitoring and gap detection
Schema-aware ingestion for new claim types
🔬
Program Integrity & FWA
AI Data Scientist · ClickML

Score claims and providers for FWA risk. Detect billing patterns that diverge from peers. Surface high-likelihood candidates for SUR review with explainable features.

Provider billing pattern analytics with peer benchmarks
Explainable FWA scoring for SUR investigators
Bias monitoring across model deployments
📈
CMS Reporting & Analytics
AI BI Specialist · Narratix · DataLens

Auto-assemble T-MSIS submissions. Generate CMS-64 reports. Executive dashboards on enrollment, spending, and program performance — with narrative commentary and full lineage.

T-MSIS automation with quality monitoring
CMS-64 quarterly reporting with audit trail
FMAP optimization and budget forecasting
A Day in the Life

From an eligibility question to a defensible determination — in seconds.

A typical eligibility-worker flow. Same shape holds for program integrity, T-MSIS reconciliation, and policy analysis.

FROM AN ELIGIBILITY QUESTION TO A DEFENSIBLE DETERMINATION A typical eligibility-worker flow. Same shape holds for program integrity, T-MSIS reconciliation, and policy analysis. 💬 STEP 1 Plain English Worker asks Cezu a member question 🐕 STEP 2 Cezu Routes Picks the right agents, checks PHI authority 🛡️ STEP 3 PHI & 42 CFR RBAC enforced, SUD records protected ⚙️ STEP 4 Federated Query Steward + Analyst retrieve across modules 📋 STEP 5 Decision Package Member 360° with cross-program context 🔍 STEP 6 IG Replay Every step auditable, replayable Total: under 5 seconds for the answer · Determination package: ~30 seconds · PHI handling logged on every step
Use Cases

What teams ship on xAQUA.

Concrete workflows scoped at peer agencies. Each one is a single use case the platform unlocks — and the platform unlocks dozens more after the first.

🔄

Unwinding Recovery

Identify members procedurally disenrolled during unwinding who remain eligible. Auto-route outreach lists with verified contact information for re-enrollment.

👶

Continuous Eligibility

Comply with 12-month child continuous eligibility. Track windows, automate maintenance, and flag exceptions before they cause coverage gaps.

🏥

MCO Oversight

Encounter data quality, capitation accuracy, network adequacy, and MCO performance — all in one governed view, with HEDIS and quality measures.

👴

LTSS & HCBS Coordination

Track waiver and institutional services across providers. Coordinate care plans, monitor authorizations, and surface utilization patterns.

💊

Pharmacy & Drug Rebates

Optimize pharmacy program costs. Track MDRP and 340B rebates. Analyze prescription patterns across populations and providers.

👨‍⚕️

Provider Network Mgmt

Streamline credentialing, track network adequacy, and automate directory maintenance. Surface gaps before members notice them.

🛡️

Program Integrity / FWA

Score claims and providers for FWA risk. Surface high-likelihood candidates for SUR. Reduce improper payment rates with defensible models.

📊

T-MSIS Submission

Automate T-MSIS data submission with built-in quality checks. Catch issues before federal feedback cycles. Full lineage on every record.

📈

CMS-64 & FMAP

Auto-assemble CMS-64 quarterly reports with audit trail. Optimize FMAP claims. Spend less of every reporting cycle on reconciliation.

Security · Sovereignty · Compliance

Compliant by default. Defensible by design.

Government data carries statutory privacy, federal reporting, and oversight obligations from day one. xAQUA is built for that posture, not against it.

🔒
Fully Private Deployment
VPC, GovCloud, or air-gapped. PHI never leaves your boundary.
🛡️
HIPAA-Aligned
PHI handling at every step. 42 CFR Part 2 for SUD records.
📋
MITA Architecture
Aligned to CMS Medicaid IT Architecture standards.
🔐
RBAC & SSO
SAML/OIDC. Role and authority enforced at every agent step.
📊
Data Lineage
Every figure traceable back to source claim or encounter.
⚖️
Bias & Fairness Monitoring
Built-in scoring of FWA and risk model fairness over time.
🌐
FedRAMP-Aligned
GovCloud-class posture. CMS-aligned security controls.
🚫
Zero Storage
xAQUA stores no PHI. Sits on top of the MES you already run.
Measurable Impact

Eligibility moves. Integrity holds. Reports submit clean.

Reference outcomes from peer-agency design conversations and adjacent production deployments on the same platform.

70%
Faster Eligibility
Determination cycle time vs. baseline
50%
Reduced FWA Loss
Provider scoring + claims analytics
3 wks
Implementation
vs. 6–9 months for traditional integration
100%
Audit Ready
Full lineage and PHI handling on every output

Bring an AI data team into your Medicaid agency.

A scoped 30–60 day pilot against your specific use cases. Live in your environment. No PHI egress. We work with state Medicaid agencies on integrated eligibility, program integrity, T-MSIS automation, and unwinding recovery.